<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Laurence Vincent&#187; deviance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laurencevincent.com/tag/deviance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laurencevincent.com</link>
	<description>Musings about strategy and a life in brand narrative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Dark Side</title>
		<link>http://www.laurencevincent.com/blog/the-dark-side/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laurencevincent.com/blog/the-dark-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 22:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding Soapbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brandmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deviance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legendary brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the dark side]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurencevincent.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most fascinating ways to study brand equity is to study the deviants&#8211;the &#8220;dark side&#8221; of branding. For anyone who thinks that a brand doesn&#8217;t have power, look no further than the Mongols, an outlawed US motorcycle gang. The Mongols took the extraordinary step of securing a trademark for their logo. The brandmark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/theoregonian/2425807605/" title="Mongols by oregonianphoto on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2327/2425807605_ef5406b06c_m.jpg"  alt="Mongols" /></a></p>
<p>One of the most fascinating ways to study brand equity is to study the deviants&#8211;the &#8220;dark side&#8221; of branding. For anyone who thinks that a brand doesn&#8217;t have power, look no further than the Mongols, an outlawed US motorcycle gang. </p>
<p>The Mongols took the extraordinary step of securing a trademark for their logo. The brandmark is synonymous with trouble, so much so that the US Department of Justice<a title="Government Seizes Control of Mongols Brand" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081023/ap_on_re_us/biker_gang_busts" target="_blank"> successfully petitioned for, and was granted, control of the trademarked logo</a>. As a result, the government has the right to seize possession of any item bearing the gang&#8217;s logo. The landmark case is causing a first amendment fire storm, but I think branding is the really interesting part of the story. First, you have an example of a government taking control of trademark rights and using those rights to enforce the law. Second, you have a great case of a legendary brand &#8212; a mark that is associated with a belief system that drives a narrative and a culture. It is a great example of a brand as the centerpiece of a narrative and social conflict. The brand can literally get you arrested&#8211;or at least detained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laurencevincent.com/blog/the-dark-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
